Re: RFC: %ebp-based backtrace patch

Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-07-07T13:00:53Z

On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 11:57:29PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Makes sense to me. If we have no clue where we are anymore, taking
> the gamble that %ebp is a valid frame pointer probably has better odds
> than that %esp points to a valid frame. This will need a comment
> though. I'll take care of that.

Thank you. Would you like me to check in the code, or will you do
both together?

--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery