From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: [patch] related_breakpoint stale ref crash fix
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 22:48:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091223224814.GA24272@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> (raw)
Hi,
getting occasional random:
PASS: gdb.threads/local-watch-wrong-thread.exp: local watchpoint still triggers
PASS: gdb.threads/local-watch-wrong-thread.exp: let thread_function0 return
PASS: gdb.threads/local-watch-wrong-thread.exp: breakpoint on thread_function0's caller
-PASS: gdb.threads/local-watch-wrong-thread.exp: local watchpoint automatically deleted
+ERROR: Process no longer exists
+UNRESOLVED: gdb.threads/local-watch-wrong-thread.exp: local watchpoint automatically deleted
It is even reproducible on HEAD using "input" file below and:
valgrind ../gdb -nx <input
(gdb) (gdb) Breakpoint 6 at 0x400685: file ./gdb.threads/local-watch-wrong-thread.c, line 47.
(gdb) ==31759== Invalid write of size 4
==31759== at 0x601A11: bpstat_check_breakpoint_conditions (breakpoint.c:3482)
==31759== by 0x601C70: bpstat_stop_status (breakpoint.c:3596)
==31759== by 0x65D228: handle_inferior_event (infrun.c:3589)
==31759== by 0x65A563: wait_for_inferior (infrun.c:2281)
==31759== by 0x659AA0: proceed (infrun.c:1883)
==31759== by 0x65300B: continue_1 (infcmd.c:668)
==31759== by 0x653282: continue_command (infcmd.c:760)
==31759== by 0x5C51D8: do_cfunc (cli-decode.c:67)
==31759== by 0x5C824F: cmd_func (cli-decode.c:1738)
==31759== by 0x48335A: execute_command (top.c:450)
==31759== by 0x67273E: command_handler (event-top.c:511)
==31759== by 0x672E53: command_line_handler (event-top.c:736)
==31759== Address 0xbbdc950 is 240 bytes inside a block of size 336 free'd
==31759== at 0x4A04D72: free (vg_replace_malloc.c:325)
==31759== by 0x486E4B: xfree (utils.c:1286)
==31759== by 0x60BC35: delete_breakpoint (breakpoint.c:8708)
==31759== by 0x60BDAF: delete_command (breakpoint.c:8765)
==31759== by 0x5C51D8: do_cfunc (cli-decode.c:67)
==31759== by 0x5C824F: cmd_func (cli-decode.c:1738)
==31759== by 0x48335A: execute_command (top.c:450)
==31759== by 0x67273E: command_handler (event-top.c:511)
==31759== by 0x672E53: command_line_handler (event-top.c:736)
==31759== by 0x672FCF: gdb_readline2 (event-top.c:817)
==31759== by 0x6725F7: stdin_event_handler (event-top.c:433)
==31759== by 0x670CDE: handle_file_event (event-loop.c:812)
==31759==
Watchpoint 4 deleted because the program has left the block in
which its expression is valid.
There is already automatic deletion of RELATED_BREAKPOINT in
map_breakpoint_numbers but "delete breakpoints" (for all the breakpoints)
calls delete_breakpoint from delete_command directly without calling
map_breakpoint_numbers and it does not delete the associated
bp_watchpoint_scope.
I find the attached patch is right for delete_breakpoint itself as such
function should not leave stale references in the leftover data structures.
How well could be other code cleaned up with this patch in place I have not
targeted by this patch.
The existing code expects accessibility of freed memory and discusses the
current stale references problem:
void
delete_breakpoint (struct breakpoint *bpt)
[...]
/* Has this bp already been deleted? This can happen because multiple
lists can hold pointers to bp's. bpstat lists are especial culprits.
One example of this happening is a watchpoint's scope bp. When the
scope bp triggers, we notice that the watchpoint is out of scope, and
delete it. We also delete its scope bp. But the scope bp is marked
"auto-deleting", and is already on a bpstat. That bpstat is then
checked for auto-deleting bp's, which are deleted.
A real solution to this problem might involve reference counts in bp's,
and/or giving them pointers back to their referencing bpstat's, and
teaching delete_breakpoint to only free a bp's storage when no more
references were extent. A cheaper bandaid was chosen. */
if (bpt->type == bp_none)
return;
[...]
bpt->type = bp_none;
xfree (bpt);
}
While fixing this part may be difficult I find the attached patch easy enough
fixing the IMO currently most common crash due to it.
No regressions on {x86_64,x86_64-m32,i686}-fedora12-linux-gnu.
Thanks,
Jan
"input":
set height 0
set width 0
set confirm no
file ../testsuite/gdb.threads/local-watch-wrong-thread
set can-use-hw-watchpoints 1
break main
run
break local-watch-wrong-thread.c:36
continue
delete breakpoints
watch *myp
continue
delete breakpoints
echo MAKE watch\n
watch *myp if trigger != 0
echo MAKE break\n
break local-watch-wrong-thread.c:60
info break
continue
echo DELETE five\n
delete 5
set trigger=1
continue
set *myp=0
break local-watch-wrong-thread.c:47
continue
2009-12-23 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
* breakpoint.c (delete_breakpoint <bpt->related_breakpoint != NULL>):
New.
--- a/gdb/breakpoint.c
+++ b/gdb/breakpoint.c
@@ -8649,6 +8649,16 @@ delete_breakpoint (struct breakpoint *bpt)
if (bpt->type == bp_none)
return;
+ /* At least avoid this stale reference until the reference counting of
+ breakpoints gets resolved. */
+ if (bpt->related_breakpoint != NULL)
+ {
+ gdb_assert (bpt->related_breakpoint->related_breakpoint == bpt);
+ bpt->related_breakpoint->disposition = disp_del_at_next_stop;
+ bpt->related_breakpoint->related_breakpoint = NULL;
+ bpt->related_breakpoint = NULL;
+ }
+
observer_notify_breakpoint_deleted (bpt->number);
if (breakpoint_chain == bpt)
next reply other threads:[~2009-12-23 22:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-23 22:48 Jan Kratochvil [this message]
2010-02-11 15:26 ` [ping] " Jan Kratochvil
2010-02-11 19:17 ` Pedro Alves
2010-02-11 22:29 ` Jan Kratochvil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091223224814.GA24272@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net \
--to=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox