From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1580 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2009 12:54:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 1571 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Dec 2009 12:54:33 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from e24smtp01.br.ibm.com (HELO e24smtp01.br.ibm.com) (32.104.18.85) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:54:28 +0000 Received: from mailhub1.br.ibm.com (mailhub1.br.ibm.com [9.18.232.109]) by e24smtp01.br.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id nBLCuYO6017181 for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 10:56:34 -0200 Received: from d24av03.br.ibm.com (d24av03.br.ibm.com [9.8.31.95]) by mailhub1.br.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id nBLCuAtx340336 for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 10:56:10 -0200 Received: from d24av03.br.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d24av03.br.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id nBLCsMfv026411 for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 10:54:23 -0200 Received: from hactar.localnet ([9.8.7.67]) by d24av03.br.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id nBLCsLYj026384 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 21 Dec 2009 10:54:22 -0200 From: Thiago Jung Bauermann To: Joel Brobecker Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Support the new PPC476 processor Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:54:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/2.6.30-2-686; KDE/4.3.2; i686; ; ) Cc: "S?rgio Durigan J?nior" , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Luis Machado , Matt Tyrlik References: <200912161847.17162.sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20091220182356.GK2788@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <20091220182356.GK2788@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200912211053.31119.bauerman@br.ibm.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-12/txt/msg00300.txt.bz2 On Sun 20 Dec 2009 16:23:56 Joel Brobecker wrote: > > I am sorry about that. When I sent the patch, I decided to use the > > same approach that I used for the catch syscall series, but apparently > > it wasn't a good idea. > > Not to worry. This is probably a matter of personal taste too, which > is why I did not demand, but rather ask if it was possible. In particular, > if someone else manages to review these patches, I'm prefectly happy. Actually, I'm in the middle of converting the patch into an incremental series. I'll post it shortly. -- []'s Thiago Jung Bauermann IBM Linux Technology Center