From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12018 invoked by alias); 17 Dec 2009 04:42:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 12002 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Dec 2009 04:42:28 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 04:42:25 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3D502BABD9; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 23:42:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id tTM3FL3XXFuI; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 23:42:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 517392BAB98; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 23:42:23 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7AE85F58CF; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 05:42:12 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 04:42:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: S?rgio Durigan J?nior Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Thiago Jung Bauermann , Luis Machado , Matt Tyrlik Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Support the new PPC476 processor Message-ID: <20091217044212.GB2788@adacore.com> References: <200912161847.17162.sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200912161847.17162.sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-12/txt/msg00223.txt.bz2 I'm very excited to see hardware-accelerated condition evaluation. I'll take a look at the patches for sure. Regarding the need for very recent kernel headers, it might be an issue. I assume the missing pieces are for the special kinds of watchpoints and breakpoints. Is there a way to disable just this code if the kernel is not recent enough? -- Joel