From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31229 invoked by alias); 7 Dec 2009 20:55:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 31221 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Dec 2009 20:55:42 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Dec 2009 20:55:40 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nB7KtLQx012688 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 7 Dec 2009 15:55:22 -0500 Received: from greed.delorie.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nB7KtKXX015318 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 7 Dec 2009 15:55:21 -0500 Received: from greed.delorie.com (greed.delorie.com [127.0.0.1] (may be forged)) by greed.delorie.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nB7KtKxT001763; Mon, 7 Dec 2009 15:55:20 -0500 Received: (from dj@localhost) by greed.delorie.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nB7KtJvv001760; Mon, 7 Dec 2009 15:55:19 -0500 Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2009 20:55:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200912072055.nB7KtJvv001760@greed.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: Doug Evans CC: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: (message from Doug Evans on Mon, 7 Dec 2009 12:25:22 -0800) Subject: Re: [RFA] save/restore environ in libiberty pex_unix_exec_child References: <20091207172641.398198456F@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> <200912072009.nB7K9moj000406@greed.delorie.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-12/txt/msg00099.txt.bz2 Hmm... my Linux doesn't even include execvpe(). Ok to check it in then, but *please* include a comment documenting the assumption that the parent won't run until the child is done.