From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1285 invoked by alias); 8 Dec 2009 00:19:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 1271 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Dec 2009 00:18:59 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Dec 2009 00:18:51 +0000 Received: from int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.17]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nB80InFO032622 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 7 Dec 2009 19:18:49 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nB80ImFR020443 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 7 Dec 2009 19:18:49 -0500 Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 00:19:00 -0000 From: Kevin Buettner To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] Update NEWS, announcing Renesas RX support Message-ID: <20091207171848.08021c76@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <83ocmaii7i.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20091207131233.6a3c2838@redhat.com> <83ocmaii7i.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-12/txt/msg00111.txt.bz2 On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 23:32:01 +0200 Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 13:12:33 -0700 > > From: Kevin Buettner > > > > The patch below updates NEWS, announcing Renesas RX support. > > > > I wasn't sure whether to add these new entries to the end of the > > current list, or put it in alphabetical order. There doesn't seem to > > be a clear precedent on this matter; in some releases, new targets > > appear in alphabetical order, in others, they weren't. I decided to > > add it to the end... > > > > Okay? > > Yes, thanks. Committed. Kevin