From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22893 invoked by alias); 3 Dec 2009 17:20:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 22877 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Dec 2009 17:20:46 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 17:20:38 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A2562BAC56; Thu, 3 Dec 2009 12:20:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id UEVugMm6FvSN; Thu, 3 Dec 2009 12:20:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF0032BAB5E; Thu, 3 Dec 2009 12:20:36 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6486BF588A; Thu, 3 Dec 2009 09:20:34 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 17:20:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Vladimir Prus Cc: Michael Snyder , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: Patches for MI reverse execution commands: FSF paperwork completed Message-ID: <20091203172034.GA2891@adacore.com> References: <00b901ca684d$bcabd9f0$36038dd0$@com> <4B0F12E9.6050804@vmware.com> <200912032011.02697.vladimir@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200912032011.02697.vladimir@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-12/txt/msg00032.txt.bz2 > Somehow, I do not see any actual patches at the above URLS, or in > the follow-ups -- only changelog entries? Is the mailing list > archive unwell? Just double-checked, and nope. There was no patch in the message whose URL was provided. You have to go back to the Aug archives to retrieve the first messages, where the patches are. -- Joel