From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5667 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2009 20:43:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 5626 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Nov 2009 20:43:10 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:43:05 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 648C210D85; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:43:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15F5810927; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:43:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NDOhb-0004mj-3Y; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:43:03 -0500 Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:43:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Joel Brobecker , Andrew Stubbs , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, "Maciej W. Rozycki" , Vladimir Prus , Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: RFC: Fix "break *EXP thread NUM" Message-ID: <20091125204303.GA21726@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Joel Brobecker , Andrew Stubbs , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, "Maciej W. Rozycki" , Vladimir Prus , Eli Zaretskii References: <20091123212736.GA3828@caradoc.them.org> <4B0BB652.3080303@codesourcery.com> <20091124142406.GA14875@caradoc.them.org> <20091124145422.GA26004@adacore.com> <20091124150533.GA8964@caradoc.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091124150533.GA8964@caradoc.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-11/txt/msg00561.txt.bz2 On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:05:33AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > Meanwhile, here's a patch that handles "t" and "task". I talked to > Andrew about this, and I still think we can get away without "+N" and > "-N"; they're only accepted by an accident of strtol. I have checked this in. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery