From: ppluzhnikov@google.com (Paul Pluzhnikov)
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: ppluzhnikov@google.com
Subject: [RFC] Interaction between HW watchpoints and 'set var'.
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:52:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091125175149.BB89D76D99@ppluzhnikov.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
Greetings,
Consider the following test case:
--- cut ---
int x;
int main()
{
int i, j;
for (i = 0; i < 500; ++i) {
j = 0; // break here
x = 42;
j = i; // expect HW watchpoint stop
}
return 0;
}
--- cut ---
gdb64-cvs -q ./a.out
Reading symbols from /tmp/a.out...done.
(gdb) b 7
Breakpoint 1 at 0x400455: file foo.c, line 7.
(gdb) r
Breakpoint 1, main () at foo.c:7
7 j = 0; // break here
(gdb) watch x
Hardware watchpoint 2: x
(gdb) c
Hardware watchpoint 2: x
Old value = 0
New value = 42
main () at foo.c:9
9 j = i; // expect HW watchpoint stop
(gdb) c
Breakpoint 1, main () at foo.c:7
7 j = 0; // break here
So far, everything is working just as one would expect.
(gdb) p x
$1 = 42
(gdb) set var x = 1
(gdb) print x
$2 = 1
(gdb) c
Breakpoint 1, main () at foo.c:7
7 j = 0; // break here
(gdb) print x
$3 = 42
Why didn't HW watchpoint fire? Clearly 'x' changed from 1 to 42.
Setting 'debug infrun' shows that the watchpoint does indeed fire,
but is ignored by watchpoint_check() because GDB thinks the old
value was 42 as well. And GDB believes that because value_assign()
does not update breakpoints.
Now, I can fix that by installing deprecated_memory_changed_hook,
but the deprecated part gives me pause.
Should I create a new memory_changed observer and remove
deprecated_memory_changed_hook instead?
Thanks,
--
Paul Pluzhnikov
next reply other threads:[~2009-11-25 17:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-25 17:52 Paul Pluzhnikov [this message]
2009-11-25 18:06 ` Joel Brobecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091125175149.BB89D76D99@ppluzhnikov.mtv.corp.google.com \
--to=ppluzhnikov@google.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox