From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
To: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>,
"gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [RFA] Fix hw watchpoints in process record.
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 12:56:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200911221255.25826.pedro@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <daef60380911211810i5ee040cfk7f646bc6011489e1@mail.gmail.com>
On Sunday 22 November 2009 02:10:23, Hui Zhu wrote:
> I think this patch still not OK.
...
> (gdb) hb *0x000000000040055b
> During symbol reading, incomplete CFI data; unspecified registers
> (e.g., rax) at 0x400550.
> Hardware assisted breakpoint 2 at 0x40055b: file 1.c, line 21.
> (gdb) record
> (gdb) c
> Continuing.
>
> Program received signal SIGTRAP, Trace/breakpoint trap.
> 0x000000000040055c in main () at 1.c:21
> 21 int c = 1;
> (gdb) info reg pc
> pc: 0x40055c
>
> The stop pc is not right. Looks we need do some special works when
> this is a simple hb.
You're confusing hardware watchpoints with hardware breakpoints.
The patch handles hardware _watchpoints_ only.
Fixing hardware breakpoints is a different and unrelated
issue.
Actually, the problem you're seeing sounds simple: The
breakpoint is set at 0x40055b, but GDB shows the SIGTRAP trigger
at 0x40055c. Off by one, that is. Completelly untested,
but I bet that something like this fixes it:
record_wait:
if (breakpoint_inserted_here_p (get_regcache_aspace (regcache),
tmp_pc))
{
/* There is a breakpoint. GDB will want to stop. */
+ if (software_breakpoint_inserted_here_p (get_regcache_aspace (regcache),
+ tmp_pc))
struct gdbarch *gdbarch = get_regcache_arch (regcache);
CORE_ADDR decr_pc_after_break
= gdbarch_decr_pc_after_break (gdbarch);
if (decr_pc_after_break)
regcache_write_pc (regcache,
tmp_pc + decr_pc_after_break);
+ }
}
--
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-22 12:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-01 1:23 Michael Snyder
2009-11-04 3:01 ` Hui Zhu
2009-11-04 17:51 ` Michael Snyder
2009-11-05 1:41 ` Hui Zhu
2009-11-05 18:41 ` Michael Snyder
2009-11-05 19:09 ` Pedro Alves
2009-11-12 0:27 ` Pedro Alves
2009-11-20 18:11 ` Michael Snyder
2009-11-21 9:41 ` Hui Zhu
2009-11-21 12:05 ` Pedro Alves
2009-11-21 19:50 ` Michael Snyder
2009-11-22 2:11 ` Hui Zhu
2009-11-22 12:56 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2009-11-22 15:45 ` Pedro Alves
2009-11-22 19:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-11-24 1:58 ` Pedro Alves
2009-11-26 2:28 ` Hui Zhu
2009-11-22 15:50 ` Pedro Alves
2009-11-22 20:21 ` Michael Snyder
2009-11-22 23:03 ` Pedro Alves
2009-11-23 3:17 ` Hui Zhu
2009-11-09 3:18 ` Hui Zhu
2009-11-09 21:20 ` Michael Snyder
2009-11-10 7:39 ` Hui Zhu
2009-11-09 17:48 ` Tom Tromey
2009-11-10 23:32 ` Michael Snyder
2009-11-11 8:49 ` Hui Zhu
2009-11-12 0:05 ` Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200911221255.25826.pedro@codesourcery.com \
--to=pedro@codesourcery.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=msnyder@vmware.com \
--cc=teawater@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox