From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16955 invoked by alias); 21 Nov 2009 05:21:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 16947 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Nov 2009 05:21:48 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:20:45 +0000 Received: (qmail 32189 invoked from network); 21 Nov 2009 05:20:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO orlando.local) (pedro@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 21 Nov 2009 05:20:40 -0000 From: Pedro Alves To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA 1/3] dwarf2_physname - cpexprs.exp Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:21:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 Cc: Keith Seitz References: <4B070525.4030107@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4B070525.4030107@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200911210520.45772.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-11/txt/msg00460.txt.bz2 On Friday 20 November 2009 21:07:49, Keith Seitz wrote: > Running these tests on CVS HEAD currently gives (go ahead, try it: I > dare you :-): Oh, man,... you know one can't resist that! > # of expected passes 77 > # of unexpected failures 54 > # of unresolved testcases 123 > > Not good -- gdb crashes along the way. That's what I get too. > However, with this entire patchset applied, all 378 test in cpexprs.exp > will pass. FYI, with 'gcc version 4.2.4 (Ubuntu 4.2.4-1ubuntu4)' (ubuntu 8.04): FAIL: gdb.cp/cpexprs.exp: print policyd4::policyd FAIL: gdb.cp/cpexprs.exp: print policyd >::policyd FAIL: gdb.cp/cpexprs.exp: list base::overload(base&) const FAIL: gdb.cp/cpexprs.exp: list base::overload(char*) const FAIL: gdb.cp/cpexprs.exp: list base::overload(int) const FAIL: gdb.cp/cpexprs.exp: list base::overload(long) const FAIL: gdb.cp/cpexprs.exp: list base::overload(short) const FAIL: gdb.cp/cpexprs.exp: list base::overload(void) const FAIL: gdb.cp/cpexprs.exp: list policyd4::policyd FAIL: gdb.cp/cpexprs.exp: list policyd >::policyd FAIL: gdb.cp/cpexprs.exp: setting breakpoint at base::overload(base&) const FAIL: gdb.cp/cpexprs.exp: continue to base::overload(base&) const FAIL: gdb.cp/cpexprs.exp: setting breakpoint at base::overload(char*) const FAIL: gdb.cp/cpexprs.exp: continue to base::overload(char*) const FAIL: gdb.cp/cpexprs.exp: setting breakpoint at base::overload(int) const FAIL: gdb.cp/cpexprs.exp: continue to base::overload(int) const FAIL: gdb.cp/cpexprs.exp: setting breakpoint at base::overload(long) const FAIL: gdb.cp/cpexprs.exp: continue to base::overload(long) const FAIL: gdb.cp/cpexprs.exp: setting breakpoint at base::overload(short) const FAIL: gdb.cp/cpexprs.exp: continue to base::overload(short) const FAIL: gdb.cp/cpexprs.exp: setting breakpoint at base::overload(void) const FAIL: gdb.cp/cpexprs.exp: continue to base::overload(void) const FAIL: gdb.cp/cpexprs.exp: setting breakpoint at policyd4::policyd FAIL: gdb.cp/cpexprs.exp: continue to policyd4::policyd FAIL: gdb.cp/cpexprs.exp: setting breakpoint at policyd >::policyd FAIL: gdb.cp/cpexprs.exp: continue to policyd >::policyd === gdb Summary === # of expected passes 360 # of unexpected failures 26 /home/pedro/gdb/keithcpp/build/gdb/testsuite/../../gdb/gdb version 7.0.50.20091121-cvs -nw -nx make[1]: *** [check-single] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/pedro/gdb/keithcpp/build/gdb/testsuite' make: *** [check] Error 2 I've no idea if this is compiler badness or not. I haven't investigated. I also saw 1 FAIL->PASS in classes.exp, 2 new PASS->FAILs and 2 new FAIL->PASSes in namespace.exp. -- Pedro Alves