From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5914 invoked by alias); 20 Nov 2009 17:10:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 5905 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Nov 2009 17:10:15 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:09:11 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6743F10B94; Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:09:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A75C10B25; Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:09:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NBWyp-0004IF-Qm; Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:09:07 -0500 Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:10:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Jan Kratochvil , Joel Brobecker Subject: Re: [patch 3/4] Fix hw watchpoints #2: reordered / simultaneously hit Message-ID: <20091120170907.GA16431@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Jan Kratochvil , Joel Brobecker References: <20091116034156.GD22701@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20091117001056.GE4557@adacore.com> <20091118100810.GA19118@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <200911201657.41540.pedro@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200911201657.41540.pedro@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-11/txt/msg00438.txt.bz2 On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 04:57:41PM +0000, Pedro Alves wrote: > WDYT? Sounds reasonable to me; I'm not entirely convinced this should be in Linux-specific code, but there's precedent, and we can always move it higher. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery