From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12174 invoked by alias); 17 Nov 2009 15:40:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 12165 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Nov 2009 15:40:20 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:39:15 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BFEB10D74; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:39:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CBF21078C; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:39:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NAQ9A-00017N-1F; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 10:39:12 -0500 Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:40:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Maxim Kuvyrkov Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCHES, M68K] Various fixes and improvements for M68K and ColdFire Message-ID: <20091117153912.GA3942@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Maxim Kuvyrkov , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <4B029388.5070001@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B029388.5070001@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-11/txt/msg00387.txt.bz2 On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 03:14:00PM +0300, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: > Hi, > > I'm submitting the following series of patches on behalf of my > colleagues at CodeSourcery. These patches fix a couple of issues in > m68k support and generally improve support for ColdFire > subarchitecture. > > The cumulative patch was test on coldfire-elf and coldfire-linux > targets with no regressions. ColdFire-elf results show several > progressions while coldfire-linux results show many progressions. These patches are all OK to check in. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery