From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10136 invoked by alias); 15 Nov 2009 22:37:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 10126 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Nov 2009 22:37:31 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 15 Nov 2009 22:36:27 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B8A510EB1; Sun, 15 Nov 2009 22:36:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F03F10EA3; Sun, 15 Nov 2009 22:36:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1N9nhp-0006FA-SU; Sun, 15 Nov 2009 17:36:25 -0500 Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 22:37:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Mark Kettenis Cc: joseph@codesourcery.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, pedro@codesourcery.com, uweigand@de.ibm.com Subject: Re: RFC: Longjmp vs LD_POINTER_GUARD revisited Message-ID: <20091115223625.GB23336@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Mark Kettenis , joseph@codesourcery.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, pedro@codesourcery.com, uweigand@de.ibm.com References: <20091115173429.GB23483@caradoc.them.org> <200911152148.nAFLmYPK018249@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200911152148.nAFLmYPK018249@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-11/txt/msg00346.txt.bz2 On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 10:48:34PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote: > Isn't it a bit ridiculous that glibc, which is a GNU project, makes > the life of GDB, another GNU project, so difficult? Yes. However, even if we could get some help from the libc developers - signs so far, very grim - this mess has now been deployed for years :-( -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery