From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31679 invoked by alias); 9 Nov 2009 17:53:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 31671 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Nov 2009 17:52:59 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:52:54 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0B3F10CE9; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 17:52:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4C251065D; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 17:52:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1N7YQ7-0007Cf-M6; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:52:51 -0500 Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:53:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: Doug Evans , Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch] Fix parallel gdb/ make check//% site.exp Message-ID: <20091109175251.GA27661@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Jan Kratochvil , Doug Evans , Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20091109171950.GA6665@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20091109175029.GA8880@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091109175029.GA8880@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-11/txt/msg00150.txt.bz2 On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 06:50:29PM +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:33:23 +0100, Doug Evans wrote: > > At Cygnus we had a general rule of keeping trees configured with relative > > paths movable, and I always forget whether we care about that anymore. > > OOC, does that impinge on this or do we no longer care about such things? > > I would find it also great but in my experience it (already) does not work. I agree with Jan; I've never had this work reliably and it's too fragile for me to trust. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery