From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30655 invoked by alias); 9 Nov 2009 17:50:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 30643 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Nov 2009 17:50:40 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:50:37 +0000 Received: from int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.17]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nA9HoZOh022936 for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 12:50:35 -0500 Received: from host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nA9HoVPj024103 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 9 Nov 2009 12:50:35 -0500 Received: from host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nA9HoVV6009162; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 18:50:31 +0100 Received: (from jkratoch@localhost) by host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nA9HoTC1009161; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 18:50:29 +0100 Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:50:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Doug Evans Cc: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch] Fix parallel gdb/ make check//% site.exp Message-ID: <20091109175029.GA8880@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> References: <20091109171950.GA6665@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-11/txt/msg00149.txt.bz2 On Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:33:23 +0100, Doug Evans wrote: > At Cygnus we had a general rule of keeping trees configured with relative > paths movable, and I always forget whether we care about that anymore. > OOC, does that impinge on this or do we no longer care about such things? I would find it also great but in my experience it (already) does not work. At least VPATH + srcdir are already absolute in the `gdb/testsuite.unix.*' subdirs. Regards, Jan