From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-68222-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 20890 invoked by alias); 8 Nov 2009 12:29:47 -0000
Received: (qmail 20881 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Nov 2009 12:29:46 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl) (83.163.83.176)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 08 Nov 2009 12:29:42 +0000
Received: from glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost [127.0.0.1]) 	by glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nA8CSF72028364; 	Sun, 8 Nov 2009 13:28:15 +0100 (CET)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost) 	by glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nA8CSD5L012111; 	Sun, 8 Nov 2009 13:28:13 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 12:29:00 -0000
Message-Id: <200911081228.nA8CSD5L012111@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: vladimir@codesourcery.com
CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <200911071402.19931.vladimir@codesourcery.com> (message from 	Vladimir Prus on Sat, 7 Nov 2009 14:02:19 +0300)
Subject: Re: [m68k] correct m68k_convert_register_p for coldfire
References: <200911061604.18419.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <hd1m4u$5lg$1@ger.gmane.org> <200911062325.nA6NPZHv008499@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <200911071402.19931.vladimir@codesourcery.com>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-11/txt/msg00129.txt.bz2

> From: Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com>
> Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 14:02:19 +0300
> 
> On Saturday 07 November 2009 Mark Kettenis wrote:
> 
> > > From: Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com>
> > > Date:  Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:24:47 +0300
> > > > Please don't apply this as is without at least trying to
> > > > build it...  current_gdbarch doesn't exist anymore.
> > > 
> > > Doh! Here's what I've ended up checking it.
> > 
> > But that doesn't make any sense.  On a real m68k,
> > register_type(gdbarch, M68K_FP0_REGNUM) will return
> > m68881_ext_type(gdbarch) and on coldfire, type !=
> > m68881_ext_type(gdbarch) is probably always true.
> 
> Does the correction in
> 
> 	http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2009-11/msg00044.html
> 
> make the code sensible?

It does.  Thanks.