From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-68216-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 437 invoked by alias); 7 Nov 2009 11:02:25 -0000
Received: (qmail 342 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Nov 2009 11:02:24 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 	tests=BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 Nov 2009 11:02:20 +0000
Received: (qmail 22837 invoked from network); 7 Nov 2009 11:02:18 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO wind.localnet) (vladimir@127.0.0.2)   by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 7 Nov 2009 11:02:18 -0000
From: Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com>
To: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
Subject: Re: [m68k] correct m68k_convert_register_p for coldfire
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 11:02:00 -0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.12.90 (Linux/2.6.24-25-generic; KDE/4.3.73; i686; svn-1043485; 2009-11-01)
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
References: <200911061604.18419.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <hd1m4u$5lg$1@ger.gmane.org> <200911062325.nA6NPZHv008499@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
In-Reply-To: <200911062325.nA6NPZHv008499@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;   charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200911071402.19931.vladimir@codesourcery.com>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-11/txt/msg00123.txt.bz2

On Saturday 07 November 2009 Mark Kettenis wrote:

> > From: Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com>
> > Date:  Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:24:47 +0300
> > > Please don't apply this as is without at least trying to
> > > build it...  current_gdbarch doesn't exist anymore.
> > 
> > Doh! Here's what I've ended up checking it.
> 
> But that doesn't make any sense.  On a real m68k,
> register_type(gdbarch, M68K_FP0_REGNUM) will return
> m68881_ext_type(gdbarch) and on coldfire, type !=
> m68881_ext_type(gdbarch) is probably always true.

Does the correction in

	http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2009-11/msg00044.html

make the code sensible?

- Volodya