From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4083 invoked by alias); 5 Nov 2009 20:09:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 4071 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Nov 2009 20:09:29 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:09:25 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 804BC10EC9; Thu, 5 Nov 2009 20:09:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D72310EA9; Thu, 5 Nov 2009 20:09:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1N68e2-00058s-Nr; Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:09:22 -0500 Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:09:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Stan Shebs Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Michael Snyder Subject: Re: Remove m68k-elf special cases from gdb.trace Message-ID: <20091105200922.GC18502@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Stan Shebs , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Michael Snyder References: <20091102012332.GA31878@caradoc.them.org> <4AF078EE.1080800@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4AF078EE.1080800@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-11/txt/msg00100.txt.bz2 On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 10:39:42AM -0800, Stan Shebs wrote: > WP has some background at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EMC_Symmetrix . > > Ironically, the original tracepoint project was motivated by EMC's > PowerPC transition - the 68k bits were just for testing in the meantime. > (IIRC EMC never used GDB for 68k-target debugging at all!) So there's > nothing lost by ditching those bits, and it will clear the field for > updating to modern setup. Thank you both. I've checked it in. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery