From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15041 invoked by alias); 3 Nov 2009 14:19:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 15028 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Nov 2009 14:19:58 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 14:19:52 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D81C42BAC76; Tue, 3 Nov 2009 09:19:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id UMgTnow1lKy4; Tue, 3 Nov 2009 09:19:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72D582BAC66; Tue, 3 Nov 2009 09:19:50 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5000CF5905; Tue, 3 Nov 2009 06:19:44 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 14:19:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Jonas Maebe Cc: Tom Tromey , Mark Kettenis , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch] Set calling convention of methods Message-ID: <20091103141944.GG4557@adacore.com> References: <691B0BA8-C606-42FF-A796-76CC9C31556A@elis.ugent.be> <200904222215.n3MMF0p2006994@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <19C107AA-5271-4C23-A6D2-AFF75BBAC4E4@elis.ugent.be> <5AA3BCA9-1ECF-446E-8B49-3132F0E470FB@elis.ugent.be> <20090930000225.GA10338@adacore.com> <8F3B6095-4766-432D-ABB5-AB4DAA2D5572@elis.ugent.be> <20090930173230.GG10338@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-11/txt/msg00050.txt.bz2 > Here's the last ping I did: > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-10/msg01788.html (it's only from > Friday, but given my past experiences, I don't expect it suddenly to be > picked up after getting buried under a couple days extra mail). > I don't know what else to do. I've sent a request for someone to take a look. I don't think I'm any more popular than you are, but I tried the good old pleading puppy eyes strategy :). Let me know if we still don't get any answer within a week, and I'll try to ask some of the AdaCore engineers who work on the GCC side to help. -- Joel