From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12760 invoked by alias); 3 Nov 2009 03:39:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 12731 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Nov 2009 03:39:29 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 03:39:25 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8A262BAC97; Mon, 2 Nov 2009 22:39:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 22s8g7yZSJWp; Mon, 2 Nov 2009 22:39:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7302F2BAC92; Mon, 2 Nov 2009 22:39:23 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 87A8CF5905; Mon, 2 Nov 2009 19:39:17 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 03:39:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Nathan Sidwell , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: x86-64 gdbserver config Message-ID: <20091103033917.GE4557@adacore.com> References: <4AEED5B3.7020107@codesourcery.com> <20091102230840.GC4557@adacore.com> <20091103023747.GA14152@caradoc.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091103023747.GA14152@caradoc.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-11/txt/msg00040.txt.bz2 > Either. It's not too uncommon in my experience to build a > 64-bit-capable toolchain as i686-linux-gnu or i686-solaris2.10. > At least for Debian, we did this to avoid having to change the triplet > inappropriately when 32-bit systems were still supported. I see, I didn't know that, thanks! I have no objection, and I can have a look at the patch if you neither you nor Pedro have already done so. -- Joel