From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21682 invoked by alias); 1 Nov 2009 19:33:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 21674 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Nov 2009 19:33:20 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 Nov 2009 19:33:16 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD87D10D7F; Sun, 1 Nov 2009 19:33:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB80710D7C; Sun, 1 Nov 2009 19:33:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1N4gAq-0008Ev-Sh; Sun, 01 Nov 2009 14:33:13 -0500 Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2009 19:33:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Michael Snyder Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [RFA] comment looks wrong... Message-ID: <20091101193312.GA31647@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Michael Snyder , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" References: <4AE89A1F.2080502@vmware.com> <20091028200435.GA13464@caradoc.them.org> <4AEDD14C.4080505@vmware.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4AEDD14C.4080505@vmware.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-11/txt/msg00003.txt.bz2 On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 10:19:56AM -0800, Michael Snyder wrote: > Does that mean you don't favor changing it? Your new formulation uses the opposite meaning of extract to the one presently there. If the old one was unclear, the new one is unclear also... -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery