From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-67973-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 13342 invoked by alias); 23 Oct 2009 16:51:19 -0000
Received: (qmail 13333 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Oct 2009 16:51:19 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Oct 2009 16:51:15 +0000
Received: (qmail 12348 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2009 16:51:13 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO orlando) (pedro@127.0.0.2)   by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 23 Oct 2009 16:51:13 -0000
From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: New ARI regression Fri Oct 23 01:57:01 UTC 2009
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 16:51:00 -0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10
Cc: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>,  Pierre Muller <muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
References: <20091023015701.GA26378@sourceware.org> <006301ca53be$eedd1b80$cc975280$@u-strasbg.fr> <4AE1D314.4030601@vmware.com>
In-Reply-To: <4AE1D314.4030601@vmware.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;   charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200910231750.54862.pedro@codesourcery.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg00596.txt.bz2

On Friday 23 October 2009 17:00:20, Michael Snyder wrote:
> Pierre Muller wrote:
> > Is there a valid reason to use LITTLE_ENDIAN rather than
> > BFD_LITTLE_ENDIAN as required by the ARI rule:
> >=20
> > LITTLE ENDIAN=A03=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0Do not use LITTLE_ENDIAN, instead=
 use
> > BFD_ENDIAN_LITTLE
> > See:
> > http://sourceware.org/gdb/current/ari/
> >=20
> > Pierre Muller
> > as ARI "maintainer"
>=20
>=20
> Thanks Pierre. =A0Checked in as obvious.

No, this is wrong.  BYTE_ORDER isn't available on all hosts, and
even if it did, its values surely don't match enum bfd_endian...

--=20
Pedro Alves