From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21316 invoked by alias); 16 Oct 2009 12:53:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 21299 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Oct 2009 12:53:15 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 12:53:10 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D16010EBB; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 12:55:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32AC7105BB; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 12:55:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MymIt-0005og-1h; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 08:53:07 -0400 Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 12:53:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Tom Tromey Cc: Joel Brobecker , Michael Eager , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Support for Xilinx MicroBlaze Message-ID: <20091016125306.GA22015@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Tom Tromey , Joel Brobecker , Michael Eager , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" References: <4AD74E86.1020500@eagercon.com> <20091015164724.GC5272@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg00363.txt.bz2 On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 12:03:45PM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote: > In fact I'd be interested to hear how gdb has dealt with this problem in > the past. I'm also sure this won't be the last time we're in this > situation. In general, I'm not reluctant to make folks use an older GDB with an older compiler. Users who get a prebuilt toolchain from Xilinx - probably the majority - won't be affected by the switch. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery