From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18827 invoked by alias); 14 Oct 2009 04:58:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 18815 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Oct 2009 04:58:36 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 04:58:31 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29FA02BAC30; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 00:58:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id rKLQyxB2Vqkh; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 00:58:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0C732BAB07; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 00:58:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id ED49BF58A0; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 21:58:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 04:58:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Andrew Stubbs Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH][SH] Fix a few architecture variant settings Message-ID: <20091014045820.GU5272@adacore.com> References: <4AD0607C.9020001@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4AD0607C.9020001@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg00300.txt.bz2 > 2009-10-10 Andrew Stubbs > > * sh-tdep.c (sh_gdbarch_init): Add show_regs settings for > bfd_mach_sh3_nommu, bfd_mach_sh2a_nofpu_or_sh3_nommu, > bfd_mach_sh2a_or_sh3e, bfd_mach_sh2a_or_sh4, bfd_mach_sh4_nommu_nofpu, > and bfd_mach_sh2a_nofpu_or_sh4_nommu_nofpu. > Move bfd_mach_sh2a_or_sh4 to use the same configuration as > bfd_mach_sh4. You really know better about these architecture to make the proper choices. I don't see any problem with your patch, so OK. -- Joel