From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14641 invoked by alias); 8 Oct 2009 19:05:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 14556 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Oct 2009 19:05:24 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Oct 2009 19:05:19 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2499B1088A; Thu, 8 Oct 2009 19:06:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D9611086E; Thu, 8 Oct 2009 19:06:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MvyIe-0006Ee-CD; Thu, 08 Oct 2009 15:05:16 -0400 Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2009 19:05:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Pedro Alves Cc: Paul Pluzhnikov , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, dje@google.com Subject: Re: [patch] Allow gdbserver to dynamically lookup libthread_db.so.1 Message-ID: <20091008190516.GA23318@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Pedro Alves , Paul Pluzhnikov , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, dje@google.com References: <20090902163344.833F476568@localhost> <200910070044.24367.pedro@codesourcery.com> <8ac60eac0910061726n18f8fa9cnea4ddd25d55fe315@mail.gmail.com> <200910081906.38504.pedro@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200910081906.38504.pedro@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg00180.txt.bz2 On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 07:06:37PM +0100, Pedro Alves wrote: > Other than that, this looks OK to me. Hi folks, I realize I've really missed the boat on this, but I'll be sad to see this go. You used to be able to use gdbserver without a working libdl - and even a statically linked gdbserver could debug threaded programs without working dynamic linking at all. I've used this for board bringup for years. How horrid would it be to support both modes of operation? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery