From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26258 invoked by alias); 2 Oct 2009 22:08:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 26249 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Oct 2009 22:08:15 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Oct 2009 22:08:10 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A7402BABA1; Fri, 2 Oct 2009 18:08:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id uNjNEyMFCMF1; Fri, 2 Oct 2009 18:08:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECDE92BAB5B; Fri, 2 Oct 2009 18:08:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9241DF5906; Fri, 2 Oct 2009 15:08:04 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 22:08:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Doug Evans Cc: GDB , "H.J. Lu" Subject: Re: PATCH: PR gdb/10649: GDB_DATADIR_PATH is used, but never defined Message-ID: <20091002220804.GE10338@adacore.com> References: <20090916215205.GA27211@lucon.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg00074.txt.bz2 > > PR gdb/10649 > > * Makefile.in (GDB_DATADIR_PATH): Renamed to ... > > (GDB_DATADIR): This. > > (xml-syscall-install): Updated. > > Joel, I think it's critical that this goes into the release branch. > > Otherwise, "make install" creates a directory called > @GDB_DATADIR_PATH@ in the install tree. Patch installed on the branch. (Doug, I trust your judgement, so if you think a patch should be applied to the branch, please just do so and explain why - If I happen to disagree, we it's easy to revert it). -- Joel