From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Cc: Ralf Corsepius <ralf.corsepius@rtems.org>,
Andreas Schwab <schwab@redhat.com>,
Pierre Muller <muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr>,
gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Fix --with-system-readline vs. readline-6.0+ - gdb-7.0? [Re: GDB 6.8.92 available for testing]
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 21:07:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091002210709.GD10338@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091002173818.GA18820@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net>
> > > >>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> writes:
> > [...]
> > > Jan> [patch] Fix --with-system-readline vs. readline-6.0+
> > > Jan> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-07/msg00755.html
> > [...]
> > > This patch is ok.
> >
> > Checked-in:
> > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2009-10/msg00011.html
>
> Forgot to ask if it should go for gdb-7.0.
As discussed with Tom on IRC, our understanding is that this is not
a critical bug, and therefore is not needed on the branch.
--
Joel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-02 21:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20090930204828.GB31446@adacore.com>
[not found] ` <4AC41F44.1040502@rtems.org>
[not found] ` <20091001170744.GC6532@adacore.com>
[not found] ` <4AC4E4F6.5080500@rtems.org>
[not found] ` <200910011733.n91HXDnX007084@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
[not found] ` <20091001182740.GG6532@adacore.com>
[not found] ` <200910011836.n91IacEh027960@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
2009-10-01 19:40 ` GDB 6.8.92 available for testing Joel Brobecker
[not found] ` <m3ljjva3tl.fsf@hase.home>
[not found] ` <002e01ca427a$5f1363b0$1d3a2b10$@u-strasbg.fr>
[not found] ` <m3bpkra1vk.fsf@hase.home>
[not found] ` <4AC49C67.9080502@rtems.org>
[not found] ` <20091001130909.GA30858@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net>
[not found] ` <m3ske1st37.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
2009-10-02 17:26 ` Jan Kratochvil
2009-10-02 17:38 ` Fix --with-system-readline vs. readline-6.0+ - gdb-7.0? [Re: GDB 6.8.92 available for testing] Jan Kratochvil
2009-10-02 17:49 ` Tom Tromey
2009-10-02 21:07 ` Joel Brobecker [this message]
[not found] ` <004701ca428e$fa377c50$eea674f0$@u-strasbg.fr>
[not found] ` <20091001172928.GE6532@adacore.com>
2009-10-01 21:22 ` [RFA] more fixes to testsuite (was RE: GDB 6.8.92 available for testing) Pierre Muller
2009-10-01 21:28 ` Joel Brobecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091002210709.GD10338@adacore.com \
--to=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr \
--cc=ralf.corsepius@rtems.org \
--cc=schwab@redhat.com \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox