From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27682 invoked by alias); 1 Oct 2009 21:10:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 27671 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Oct 2009 21:10:31 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 21:10:24 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F75F108A3; Thu, 1 Oct 2009 21:11:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEEB110747; Thu, 1 Oct 2009 21:11:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MtSul-0004cv-4n; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 17:10:15 -0400 Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 21:10:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Caz Yokoyama , 'Eli Zaretskii' , pedro@codesourcery.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: symbolic debug of loadable modules with kgdb light Message-ID: <20091001211015.GA17752@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Joel Brobecker , Caz Yokoyama , 'Eli Zaretskii' , pedro@codesourcery.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20090929163910.GO9003@adacore.com> <93F096FEF7ED4579B52B23D69DA91195@xpjpn> <8363b0qm0n.fsf@gnu.org> <20090930201204.GH10338@adacore.com> <5650DA603A804427AA3B3F8F91164548@xpjpn> <20091001163330.GL10338@adacore.com> <0C6ED71F84CD48A9A37E2161011EF64B@xpjpn> <83zl8aq307.fsf@gnu.org> <20091001204624.GP10338@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091001204624.GP10338@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg00029.txt.bz2 On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 01:46:24PM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote: > > Actually I support your spellings. Ctrl-C is much popular than control-c, > > BREAK is popular than break for break signal. SysRq-g should be BREAK-g as > > Joel said. > > Your arguments make sense and I am fine with your choices. But we generally > use lower-case names for the various GDB settings, so do double-check > with Daniel J and Pedro that they are also fine with these choices. I have no opinion (and think we've spent more time on these names than they required - let's just do it). -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery