From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21780 invoked by alias); 1 Oct 2009 17:01:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 21600 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Oct 2009 17:01:17 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 17:01:12 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 940082BABB0; Thu, 1 Oct 2009 13:01:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id ECzpY8xJVk0q; Thu, 1 Oct 2009 13:01:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59B642BABAF; Thu, 1 Oct 2009 13:01:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 99327F593D; Thu, 1 Oct 2009 10:01:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 17:01:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [commit] Fix fnchange.lst Message-ID: <20091001170107.GN10338@adacore.com> References: <831vm3w9ic.fsf@gnu.org> <20090919155750.GU8910@adacore.com> <83ws3uvney.fsf@gnu.org> <20090920161048.GX8910@adacore.com> <83my4pv78y.fsf@gnu.org> <83ljk9v1qa.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83ljk9v1qa.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg00016.txt.bz2 > Here you go. Save as "chkfnames" and invoke it like this: > > srcdir=FOO tmpdir=BAR ./chkfnames Can we make the script ignore libdecnumber and gnulib, .cvsignore files? Should we also skip testsuite files? Right now, the script as is generates a lot of output about some things that we cannot fix in GDB itself. From a Q/A perspective, this is going to cause us to miss. What should we do with the entries in section called: "The following resolve to the same SysV file names:" ? -- Joel