From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8381 invoked by alias); 1 Oct 2009 16:44:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 8371 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Oct 2009 16:44:46 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 16:44:43 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50812108A3; Thu, 1 Oct 2009 16:45:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3959D10747; Thu, 1 Oct 2009 16:45:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MtOlk-0006A4-Pj; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 12:44:40 -0400 Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 16:44:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Mark Kettenis Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] Signals & single-stepping Message-ID: <20091001164440.GA23655@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Mark Kettenis References: <200909301440.n8UEevPb017814@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20090930162513.GA10304@caradoc.them.org> <200910011551.19751.pedro@codesourcery.com> <200910011715.01074.pedro@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200910011715.01074.pedro@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg00014.txt.bz2 On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 05:15:00PM +0100, Pedro Alves wrote: > (gdb) signal SIGUSR1 > that can't step into signal handlers> IMO that's an improvement over missing all breakpoints on such targets... -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery