From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32651 invoked by alias); 29 Sep 2009 21:29:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 32640 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Sep 2009 21:29:18 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:29:14 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 137512BAB36; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:29:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id h2xr0Wb+UZA5; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:29:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B80B22BAB1F; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:29:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 77B10F593D; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:29:10 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:29:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Hui Zhu Cc: Michael Snyder , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [RFA] let record_resume fail immediately on error Message-ID: <20090929212910.GG6362@adacore.com> References: <4AA68C92.7070905@vmware.com> <4ABE5E8D.8080209@vmware.com> <20090928160728.GB9003@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00937.txt.bz2 > Sorry I didn't talk it very clear. Let me try it. In other words: If an error occurs during recording, somehow the inferior "runs away", meaning runs until completion? Do we lose the process record? Based on the transcript of the session *with* the patch you propose, it looks like GDB is now just stuck on that instruction that it does not know how to record. Is that really progress? -- Joel