From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11462 invoked by alias); 29 Sep 2009 21:08:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 11448 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Sep 2009 21:08:56 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:08:52 +0000 Received: from int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.21]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8TL8RO4005616; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:08:27 -0400 Received: from host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8TL8O1x014750 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:08:26 -0400 Received: from host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8TL8Oke007707; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 23:08:24 +0200 Received: (from jkratoch@localhost) by host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n8TL8Nuj007706; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 23:08:23 +0200 Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:08:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Ulrich Weigand Cc: Matt Rice , Joel Brobecker , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [ia64] Regression: Re: [rfc] Fix Obj-C method calls on 64-bit PowerPC Message-ID: <20090929210823.GA1352@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> References: <8ba6bed40909281541y1d9455fas873a602caf2508fa@mail.gmail.com> <200909290050.n8T0o1dF004541@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> <20090929154328.GA15183@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090929154328.GA15183@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00935.txt.bz2 On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:43:28 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On ia64-rhel5.4-linux-gnu with this patch there are still these regressions: > +FAIL: gdb.base/corefile.exp: print func2::coremaker_local > +FAIL: gdb.base/corefile.exp: backtrace in corefile.exp > +FAIL: gdb.base/corefile.exp: up in corefile.exp > +FAIL: gdb.base/corefile.exp: up in corefile.exp (reinit) > +FAIL: gdb.base/gcore.exp: where in corefile (pattern 1) > +FAIL: gdb.base/gcore.exp: corefile restored general registers > +FAIL: gdb.base/gcore.exp: corefile restored all registers > +FAIL: gdb.base/gcore.exp: capture_command_output failed on print array_func::local_array. > +FAIL: gdb.base/gcore.exp: corefile restored stack array > +FAIL: gdb.base/gcore.exp: corefile restored backtrace > +FAIL: gdb.gdb/selftest.exp: unknown source line after step over ttyarg initialization > +FAIL: gdb.gdb/selftest.exp: step into xmalloc call > +FAIL: gdb.threads/gcore-thread.exp: corefile contains at least two threads > +FAIL: gdb.threads/gcore-thread.exp: a corefile thread is executing thread2 > +FAIL: gdb.threads/gcore-thread.exp: thread2 is current thread in corefile FYI these regressions are no longer reproducible, it may have been a random result. Thanks, Jan