From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20543 invoked by alias); 29 Sep 2009 16:40:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 20531 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Sep 2009 16:40:33 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:40:28 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A8F02BAB27; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:40:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id GREcdPt+e0jz; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:40:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5FD22BAAE3; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:40:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D01DBF593D; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 09:40:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:40:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: Ulrich Weigand , Matt Rice , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [ia64] Regression: Re: [rfc] Fix Obj-C method calls on 64-bit PowerPC Message-ID: <20090929164019.GP9003@adacore.com> References: <8ba6bed40909281541y1d9455fas873a602caf2508fa@mail.gmail.com> <200909290050.n8T0o1dF004541@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> <20090929154328.GA15183@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20090929161608.GN9003@adacore.com> <20090929162812.GA23661@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090929162812.GA23661@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00925.txt.bz2 > Checked-in for HEAD: > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2009-09/msg00223.html > Have not touched gdb_7_0-branch. Go ahead with the branch. The patch is good, regardless of whether Ulrich's patch exposes the issue or not. -- Joel