From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6700 invoked by alias); 29 Sep 2009 16:17:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 6689 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Sep 2009 16:17:31 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:17:24 +0000 Received: from int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.21]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8TGEifJ013493; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:14:44 -0400 Received: from host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8TGEfQT005535 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:14:44 -0400 Received: from host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8TGEfZq022495; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:14:41 +0200 Received: (from jkratoch@localhost) by host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n8TGEecU022492; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:14:40 +0200 Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:17:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Ulrich Weigand Cc: Matt Rice , Joel Brobecker , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [ia64] Regression: Re: [rfc] Fix Obj-C method calls on 64-bit PowerPC Message-ID: <20090929161440.GA22312@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> References: <20090929154328.GA15183@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <200909291607.n8TG7O3H027260@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200909291607.n8TG7O3H027260@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00922.txt.bz2 On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:07:24 +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > I agree that ia64_convert_from_func_ptr_addr should not error out in such cases, > so your patch looks good to me (would have looked good in any case, even without > the Obj-C changes) ... Are you going to check it in? Considering this as your check-in approval so yes. I also think this patch is appropriate no matter if it will be required for the descriptor solution. > > On ia64-rhel5.4-linux-gnu with this patch there are still these regressions: > > +FAIL: gdb.base/corefile.exp: print func2::coremaker_local > > +FAIL: gdb.base/corefile.exp: backtrace in corefile.exp > > +FAIL: gdb.base/corefile.exp: up in corefile.exp > > +FAIL: gdb.base/corefile.exp: up in corefile.exp (reinit) > > +FAIL: gdb.base/gcore.exp: where in corefile (pattern 1) > > +FAIL: gdb.base/gcore.exp: corefile restored general registers > > +FAIL: gdb.base/gcore.exp: corefile restored all registers > > +FAIL: gdb.base/gcore.exp: capture_command_output failed on print array_func::local_array. > > +FAIL: gdb.base/gcore.exp: corefile restored stack array > > +FAIL: gdb.base/gcore.exp: corefile restored backtrace > > +FAIL: gdb.gdb/selftest.exp: unknown source line after step over ttyarg initialization > > +FAIL: gdb.gdb/selftest.exp: step into xmalloc call > > +FAIL: gdb.threads/gcore-thread.exp: corefile contains at least two threads > > +FAIL: gdb.threads/gcore-thread.exp: a corefile thread is executing thread2 > > +FAIL: gdb.threads/gcore-thread.exp: thread2 is current thread in corefile > > Are these regressions also introduced by my Obj-C patch? That seems > really odd to me ... Tested HEAD with our change unpatched -> HEAD with my ia64 change. Verified gdb.base/corefile.exp is reproducible this way. Therefore going to check these specific cases more. Thanks, Jan