From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7288 invoked by alias); 29 Sep 2009 14:15:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 7264 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Sep 2009 14:15:43 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:15:39 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 963432BAB68; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:15:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id jC8QFbhIDwE4; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:15:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F7A12BAB0A; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:15:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 09B7EF593D; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 07:15:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:15:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pierre Muller Cc: 'Eli Zaretskii' , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] windows-nat.c: Handle CTRL_BREAK_EVENT in ctrl_c_handler Message-ID: <20090929141530.GM9003@adacore.com> References: <002001ca3acf$a0d8bb40$e28a31c0$@u-strasbg.fr> <83hbuwurzc.fsf@gnu.org> <000601ca3b9a$3cbbe670$b633b350$@u-strasbg.fr> <83ocoxsl83.fsf@gnu.org> <000001ca40d6$9ac3c260$d04b4720$@u-strasbg.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000001ca40d6$9ac3c260$d04b4720$@u-strasbg.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00914.txt.bz2 > Could we apply both > the patch to windows-nat.c and to docs to branch > or is it too late? It is not too late, you have until tomorrow for 7.0. IIRC, this patch was approved for the branch, right? -- Joel