From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14584 invoked by alias); 28 Sep 2009 18:32:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 14572 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Sep 2009 18:32:21 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:32:16 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6700710EAC; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:32:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E0DF10EAA; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:32:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MsL1B-000408-7D; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:32:13 -0400 Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:32:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Ulrich Weigand , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [rfc] Fix bitfield regressions on 64-bit big-endian targets Message-ID: <20090928183213.GA15054@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Joel Brobecker , Ulrich Weigand , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20090927222844.GA32132@caradoc.them.org> <200909280920.n8S9KVeK008925@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> <20090928162033.GE9003@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090928162033.GE9003@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00882.txt.bz2 On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 09:20:33AM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote: > > Thanks for the review. I've committed the patch now. > > I think we should include this one in 7.0 as well. What do others think? I do also. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery