From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10734 invoked by alias); 28 Sep 2009 19:46:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 10725 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Sep 2009 19:45:59 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from e24smtp02.br.ibm.com (HELO e24smtp02.br.ibm.com) (32.104.18.86) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 19:45:56 +0000 Received: from mailhub1.br.ibm.com (mailhub1.br.ibm.com [9.18.232.109]) by e24smtp02.br.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n8SJvn4q004388 for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:57:49 -0300 Received: from d24av04.br.ibm.com (d24av04.br.ibm.com [9.18.232.43]) by mailhub1.br.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id n8SJkVq5925984 for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:46:31 -0300 Received: from d24av04.br.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d24av04.br.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id n8SJjoAW019708 for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:45:51 -0300 Received: from miki.localnet ([9.8.3.142]) by d24av04.br.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id n8SJjbd5019019 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:45:50 -0300 From: =?iso-8859-1?q?S=E9rgio_Durigan_J=FAnior?= To: Doug Evans Subject: Re: [RFC] mask off is-syscall bit for TRAP_IS_SYSCALL Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 19:46:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (Linux/2.6.30.4; KDE/4.3.1; i686; ; ) Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20090928193905.32592843AC@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> In-Reply-To: <20090928193905.32592843AC@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200909281645.34313.sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00887.txt.bz2 On Monday 28 September 2009, Doug Evans wrote: > This patch fixes things by masking off the 0x80 bit before > passing the signal number to up the call chain. >=20 > Ok to check in? As we already discussed that on IRC, that's fine by me. Thank you for doin= g=20 this. Regards, --=20 S=E9rgio Durigan J=FAnior Linux on Power Toolchain - Software Engineer Linux Technology Center - LTC IBM Brazil