From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28442 invoked by alias); 28 Sep 2009 18:07:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 28339 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Sep 2009 18:07:35 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:07:27 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 301782BAB43; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:07:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Wd7CGE8q2mbY; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:07:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 609F42BAB2B; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:07:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D9D6BF594A; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 09:20:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:07:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Ulrich Weigand Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [rfc] Fix bitfield regressions on 64-bit big-endian targets Message-ID: <20090928162033.GE9003@adacore.com> References: <20090927222844.GA32132@caradoc.them.org> <200909280920.n8S9KVeK008925@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200909280920.n8S9KVeK008925@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00878.txt.bz2 > Thanks for the review. I've committed the patch now. I think we should include this one in 7.0 as well. What do others think? -- Joel