From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19572 invoked by alias); 25 Sep 2009 17:29:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 19554 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Sep 2009 17:29:45 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:29:43 +0000 Received: from int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8PHTUlP003492; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:29:30 -0400 Received: from greed.delorie.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8PHTOoO016585 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:29:26 -0400 Received: from greed.delorie.com (greed.delorie.com [127.0.0.1] (may be forged)) by greed.delorie.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8PHTMUM010153; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:29:22 -0400 Received: (from dj@localhost) by greed.delorie.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n8PHTL7h010150; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:29:21 -0400 Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:29:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200909251729.n8PHTL7h010150@greed.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: Ralf Wildenhues CC: cygwin@cwilson.fastmail.fm, nickc@redhat.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <20090925172108.GA1808@gmx.de> (message from Ralf Wildenhues on Fri, 25 Sep 2009 19:21:09 +0200) Subject: Re: RFA/RFC: Pass --cache-file=/dev/null on to subconfigures References: <20090925172108.GA1808@gmx.de> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00811.txt.bz2 > Well, with upstream Autoconf, you only ever have one cache file anyway, Does it properly handle parallel builds simultaneously trying to update the cache, yet? I've been adding a .NOTPARALLEL: to the toplevel Makefiles of all my builds for some time now, to avoid cache collision problems.