From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18987 invoked by alias); 25 Sep 2009 16:07:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 18854 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Sep 2009 16:07:13 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:07:10 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9173D2BAB57; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:07:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id VHvUNtGuT9MB; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:07:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 484B62BAB2E; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:07:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BCE12F593C; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 09:07:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:07:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Tom Tromey Cc: Doug Evans , S?rgio Durigan J?nior , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Wording of "catch syscall " warning Message-ID: <20090925160705.GC5077@adacore.com> References: <20090925003107.87780843AC@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> <200909242302.48369.sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20090925022021.GK2112@adacore.com> <200909242338.37707.sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00805.txt.bz2 > I had assumed Joel meant to print the warning just the first time the > command is used. That way users who never use the command will not see > the warning at all. Good suggestion! -- Joel