From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14935 invoked by alias); 25 Sep 2009 01:49:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 14758 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Sep 2009 01:49:22 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 01:49:19 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58B6C2BAB4F; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:49:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id skk3VZ34E1xN; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:49:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C6562BAADF; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:49:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E4F33F593C; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:49:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 01:49:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Doug Evans Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com Subject: Re: [RFC] Wording of "catch syscall " warning Message-ID: <20090925014913.GI2112@adacore.com> References: <20090925003107.87780843AC@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090925003107.87780843AC@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00770.txt.bz2 > One alternative is to not print the warning at all if system call > names are unavailable. I'm slightly leaning towards not printing any warning at all. This is mostly because I dislike warnings when there is nothing I can do about them. -- Joel