Re: Another proposal for frontends and queries.

Hui Zhu
2009-09-16T14:34:02Z

On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 22:25, Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com> wrote:
>> And about the patch I said can handle this issue is "set record query
>> <on|off>" patch.  I cannot find who don't like this patch.
>
> I am one of the maintainers would dislike this idea.

Sorry.
But I cannot find you your comment to this patch. I just find Eli and
Tom's mail.

>
>> On the other hand, about the nquery.
>> Let me talk my idea.  The nquery is a function of GDB right?  MI is a
>> function of GDB too.   Eclipse is a very important soft that support
>> GDB.
>> If you want change nquery to query, why not remove nquery directly?
>
> I had the same thoughts, actually. But we have one more usage of that
> function relative to pending breakpoints, and for some reason it was
> decided that the default was 'n' rather than 'y'. Not sure why.

Because it will delete the execution log follow this insn.

Thanks,
Hui