From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30193 invoked by alias); 15 Sep 2009 04:13:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 30184 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Sep 2009 04:13:28 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 04:13:24 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 892A52BAB5B; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:13:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id prZsfRrdyjNm; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:13:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D9502BAB0A; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:13:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EFCFEF589B; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:13:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 04:13:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: S?rgio Durigan J?nior Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [RFC 1/3] catch syscall -- try 6 -- Source-code modifications Message-ID: <20090915041316.GA8910@adacore.com> References: <200909041600.47670.sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <200909121415.11828.sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <200909131418.02082.sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <200909150054.58517.sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200909150054.58517.sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00475.txt.bz2 > Unfortunately, during the commit process, I made some stupid mistakes > here with my local copy of the repository, and had to do 2 or 3 extra > commits [...] No problem at all, as long as the difference between the source before you committed the change and after is equal to the patch that you submitted. So, I would not worry about this. -- Joel