From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 442 invoked by alias); 15 Sep 2009 03:55:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 429 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Sep 2009 03:55:13 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from e24smtp03.br.ibm.com (HELO e24smtp03.br.ibm.com) (32.104.18.24) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:55:08 +0000 Received: from mailhub3.br.ibm.com (mailhub3.br.ibm.com [9.18.232.110]) by e24smtp03.br.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n8F3pAQO020712 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:51:10 -0300 Received: from d24av02.br.ibm.com (d24av02.br.ibm.com [9.18.232.47]) by mailhub3.br.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id n8F3tich1650826 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:55:44 -0300 Received: from d24av02.br.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d24av02.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n8F3t4Bk026823 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:55:04 -0300 Received: from miki.localnet ([9.8.13.250]) by d24av02.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n8F3t1GD026769 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:55:04 -0300 From: =?iso-8859-1?q?S=E9rgio_Durigan_J=FAnior?= To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC 1/3] catch syscall -- try 6 -- Source-code modifications Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:55:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (Linux/2.6.30.4; KDE/4.3.1; i686; ; ) Cc: Eli Zaretskii References: <200909041600.47670.sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <200909121415.11828.sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <200909131418.02082.sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <200909131418.02082.sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200909150054.58517.sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00474.txt.bz2 Hello, On Sunday 13 September 2009, S=E9rgio Durigan J=FAnior wrote: > Hello, >=20 > On Saturday 12 September 2009, S=E9rgio Durigan J=FAnior wrote: > > On Saturday 12 September 2009, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > > What about the patch now? Ok to check in? > > > > > > I think everybody approved it, right? How about waiting one more day > > > and then checking it in? > > > > Sounds like a plan :-). Thank you. >=20 > FYI, I decided to wait until tomorrow (Monday) night, because I suspect > that most of the GMs are not seeing any e-mails this weekend. Anyway, if > nobody complains about my patch, I intend to check it in tomorrow > (finally). The patch finally is commited, but... Unfortunately, during the commit process, I made some stupid mistakes here= =20 with my local copy of the repository, and had to do 2 or 3 extra commits in= =20 order to include everything needed to implement the catch syscall. Things = are=20 now working as expected (I tested here), but I'm afraid I didn't do a good = job=20 at CVS :-(. Should I do anything to fix this error? I am really, really=20 sorry about that :-/. At least, GDB now has the catch syscall command, heh= ... Regards, --=20 S=E9rgio Durigan J=FAnior Linux on Power Toolchain - Software Engineer Linux Technology Center - LTC IBM Brazil