From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22215 invoked by alias); 13 Sep 2009 16:29:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 22206 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Sep 2009 16:29:47 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 16:29:44 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA5BB2BAACC; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 12:29:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id ekjDwkNoQKT9; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 12:29:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A17352BAAC2; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 12:29:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 98DDDF589B; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 09:29:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 16:29:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [gdb-7.0/doco] Re: RFC: Mark outer frames Message-ID: <20090913162939.GB8327@adacore.com> References: <20090828213237.GA9175@caradoc.them.org> <20090903225219.GA1266@adacore.com> <20090910022834.GI20694@adacore.com> <20090910191209.GA29124@caradoc.them.org> <20090910224103.GM20694@adacore.com> <20090912221342.GW20694@adacore.com> <20090912221432.GA21139@adacore.com> <83ljkjzgge.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83ljkjzgge.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00384.txt.bz2 > > This patch adds some documentation back about null_frame_id, as you > > asked a while back. Does this looks good to you? > > Yes, but please be sure to have two spaces between sentences, not one. Outch, rookie mistake :-(, sorry about that. I'm glad there is a review process. Fixed and checked in. Thanks, -- Joel