From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17759 invoked by alias); 10 Sep 2009 19:12:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 17751 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Sep 2009 19:12:17 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 19:12:12 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D48FB10DC7; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 19:12:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B891B10A34; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 19:12:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Mlp3x-0007cE-J0; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 15:12:09 -0400 Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 19:12:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [gdb-7.0] Re: RFC: Mark outer frames Message-ID: <20090910191209.GA29124@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Joel Brobecker , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20090828213237.GA9175@caradoc.them.org> <20090903225219.GA1266@adacore.com> <20090910022834.GI20694@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090910022834.GI20694@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00278.txt.bz2 On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 07:28:34PM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote: > Any objection to Daniel's patch? I'm going to be aggressive here, > and apply on Friday unless someone objects. I am attaching Daniel's > patch for easier reference. Mine is attached next. I have no objection. I think the patch is progress. There are two pieces of feedback: s/think/thing/ you found, and Eli requested a slightly expanded explanation in the internals documentation. Do you feel up to the latter? I apologize for being such a bum about this, but I haven't got the time to spare right now; I'm under deadline pressure at work. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery