From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23974 invoked by alias); 8 Sep 2009 20:08:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 23941 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Sep 2009 20:08:28 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 20:08:18 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76B782BABB3; Tue, 8 Sep 2009 16:08:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id t0sJcdsYmnQS; Tue, 8 Sep 2009 16:08:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 796212BAB60; Tue, 8 Sep 2009 16:08:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 18CEBF589B; Tue, 8 Sep 2009 13:08:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 20:08:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Michael Snyder Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" , Hui Zhu , Mark Kettenis Subject: Re: [RFA] cleanup of syscall consts in process record Message-ID: <20090908200802.GT30677@adacore.com> References: <4AA2D95B.4090904@vmware.com> <20090908164934.GP30677@adacore.com> <4AA696F6.6040503@vmware.com> <4AA69878.9060602@vmware.com> <20090908180402.GR30677@adacore.com> <4AA6AB33.20304@vmware.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4AA6AB33.20304@vmware.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00222.txt.bz2 > So this is approved, then? Yep, especially since Mark is fine with the patch as well. -- Joel