Re: [RFA] cleanup of syscall consts in process record

Hui Zhu
2009-09-06T04:27:32Z

On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 10:49, Joel Brobecker<brobecker@adacore.com> wrote:
>> I think this patch is perfect.  It make prec linux code very clear.
>
> Note that this also settles the argument of signed versus unsigned,
> I believe. enum types are represented as an int, right?

I just post a new patch for it. Please help me review it.

Hui
>
>> Does it can check in before 7.0 branch?  If so, I can update the "Fix
>> cygwin build error with i386-linux-tdep.c" follow this patch.
>
> I don't see a reason why this patch should be applied after 7.0.
> I haven't looked at it yet, but it seemed fairly mechanical.
>
> --
> Joel
>