From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2579 invoked by alias); 5 Sep 2009 08:02:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 2431 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Sep 2009 08:02:09 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Sep 2009 08:02:06 +0000 Received: from int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8581MoV002456; Sat, 5 Sep 2009 04:01:22 -0400 Received: from host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n857xfAm005213 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 5 Sep 2009 04:01:21 -0400 Received: from host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n857xeI3026447; Sat, 5 Sep 2009 09:59:40 +0200 Received: (from jkratoch@localhost) by host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n857tpDi026255; Sat, 5 Sep 2009 09:55:51 +0200 Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2009 08:02:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Doug Evans , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] move dwarf2_free_objfile to dwarf2_per_objfile_cleanup Message-ID: <20090905075551.GA25118@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> References: <20090904235009.5FA8D843B9@localhost> <20090905000805.GA30677@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090905000805.GA30677@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00116.txt.bz2 On Sat, 05 Sep 2009 02:08:05 +0200, Joel Brobecker wrote: > That was until I saw the performance improvement patch from Jan ;-). As during its development there were some unexpected regressions I understand it may be more suitable for 7.1. If 7.0 is going to happen ;-). Regards, Jan